The Glue Does Not Show: Mineral restoration and specimen value

Shades of grey wherever I go
The more I find out the less that I know
Black and white is how it should be
But shades of grey are the colors I see

Billy Joel, Shades of Grey, released 1993.


Stephanite, Husky Mine, Mayo Mining District, Yukon Territory, Canada. The crystal group is approximately 6.3 cm across, and outstanding for the locality; Husky Mine polybasite and stephanites typically have an iridescence that it probably caused by light reflection/refraction in a very thin coating of an unknown silicate. Jeff Scovil Photo.

In the mid 1980s I was first asked to be a judge of the competitive mineral exhibits at the Tucson Gem and Mineral Show. At that time the TGMS competition, and its two top awards – the McDole Trophy (best case of minerals entered into competition) and the Lidstrom Trophy (best individual mineral entered into competition) – were considered the pinnacle of the mineral world. The winners of these awards looked like a “Who’s Who” of the mineral collecting community, and every year the competition was passionate and savage. The rules for the McDole and Lidstrom awards were few; it was based on the judges experiences, biases, and an element of luck on who decided to enter the competition. The judging for the McDole and Lidstrom awards was also a “discussion” rather than some type of formal poll — a judge with a domineering personality could filibuster the other judges into accepting his or her opinion.  I recall clearly the discussion around a particular specimen entered into the Lidstrom competition that I was fond of;  “We can’t possibly consider that specimen a best – it has been repaired!”  The pronouncement carried such an air of academic certitude that I immediately agreed.  Of course, it had been repaired!  How could it really be a great mineral specimen if there was some glue involved!

It was not too long after that I began to ponder the absurdity of dismissing anything that is repaired as inherently flawed (on a personal note, now that I have multiple metal parts in various joints, I embrace the repaired).  Repairing a mineral is rather common – mineral extraction is inherently a violent activity, and the very act of handling a specimen introduces the possibility of drops, dings and scratches. But there is still a feeling that repairs should affect the monetary value of a specimen. I don’t think I have ever been to mineral show where I have not heard some version of the conversation between a dealer and a collector where the potential purchaser doesn’t ask for a significant discount because the specimen has been repaired.  The stephanite pictured at the top of this article is a fantastic complex crystal from the Husky Mine in the Yukon Territory, Canada.  I first committed to buying this piece for my collection around the year 2000.  However, when I went to go pick it up from the dealer I opened the box and the marvelous sample of “brittle silver” was in three pieces!  The stress of transport had caused the crystal to part along inter-growth boundaries.  I was heart broken, and walked away from a masterpiece.  The dealer repaired the piece expertly, and eventually I was able to acquire it.  However, several years later I was transporting it to be photographed and it “parted” again!  Fortunately, it was once again restored, and now sits permanently in my mineral cabinet never to travel again.  I believe it is the best, or one of the best, Husky Mine stephanites in existence, and the fact that it has some clear cyanoacrylate helping to hold it together is inconsequential.

Repair would, thus, seem to be a rather “black and white” issue – restoring a collectable to its original configuration is not fraud or even misrepresentation of nature. Sadly, it is not “black and white”, and repair/restoration has become a spectrum disorder in the mineral collecting world.  Today many consider filling missing gaps in crystals with acrylic resin, buffing away scratches on crystal faces or even heating a specimen to “restore” its primordial color as simply “sophisticated repair”.  Not black and white, but shades of grey.


The Pieta, carved by Michelangelo in the 16th century. The statue has been repaired a number of times in the last 500 years — most recently removing the damage done by a geology hammer (!) wielded by a lunatic.

Real Repairs

The Pieta is a signature masterwork of Italian sculptor Michelangelo, and one of the most famous works of art in history. Michelangelo was only 23 years old when he carved the single block of Carrara marble into a haunting image of a crucified Jesus being held by his mother. By any figure of merit, the Pieta is priceless. Yet, it is repaired – several times! The four fingers of Mary’s left hand were snapped off during a move in the 18th century (restored in 1736).  The most egregious damage occurred in an instant of insanity when Laszio Toth, an unemployed Hungarian geologist attacked. Toth struck the Pieta more than a dozen times with his field hammer, breaking off Mary’s arm, part of her nose, and chipping her face.


Mary’s hand after the Toth attack. More than a hundred fragments of marble had to be reassembled to restore the Pieta.

The repair of the statue was done by a team of 10 people painstakingly reassembling the fragments and filling in voids with a mixture of powdered marble and polyester resin.  When the restore work was unveiled it was claimed that it was impossible to identify where the damage had been.  Some experts suggest that with the passage of time the resin has perceptibly changed color, but in general the repair has faded into history and the magnificence of the Pieta has been restored.

The restoration of the Pieta might be a fanciful stretch as an analogy for mineral repair, but it does frame the philosophy of specimen “value”.  It is highly unlikely that the reconstruction of Mary’s left hand would effect the value of the Pieta if the Vatican decided to part with the treasure;  I can’t imagine any art collector asking the Vatican for a “discount” because the marble was not exactly as Michelangelo carved it long ago.  On the other hand, the restoration process went to great lengths to assure that nothing changed from the original – no added expression to Mary’s face, no extra lamb seated at her feet.


The Alma Queen; a 10 cm, complex rhomb of rhodochrosite perched in a matrix of fine quartz crystals.  This “rock” was found in 1966 at the Sweet Home MIne, and has been called the finest mineral specimen in the world.

The Rhodochrosite Royalty – a family full of plastic surgery

In 1966, a 90 year old silver mine located on the slopes of Mt Bross – one of Colorado’s 53 peaks that have elevations in excess of 14,000 feet above sea level – yielded a remarkable mineral specimen.  The mine was called the Sweet Home, and during its on-again, off-again mining history had periodically produced some of the world’s best rhodochrosite.  However, the standard for rhodochrosite was reset when a mining crew drilled into a pocket and found a 10 cm rhombohedron of cherry red rhodochrosite perched on a slab of pencil thin white quartz. The specimen was purchased by one of Colorado’s earliest fine mineral dealerships, Crystal Gallery, for the princely sum of $2500.  Crystal Gallery was a partnership between Merle Reid and Colorado collector legend George Robertson.  The rhodochrosite ended up in the hands of Peter Bancroft (much to the chagrin of George Robertson), who christen the piece as the “Alma Queen”, in recognition of the mining town a few miles southeast of the Sweet Home Mine (the picture above is “official” photo of the Alma Queen from its present home, the Houston Museum of Natural Science).  In short order the Queen passed through a hands of a number of famous mineral dealers, finally becoming a prized possession of Perkins Sams.  In 1986, Sams sold the Queen to Houston Museum – and a few years later it was being moved and was broken!  Actually, it was not too surprising given that the rhodochrosite has perfect cleavage, and the huge crystal was isolated and perched on matrix.  Fortunately, the crystal was “repaired” – it is impossible to see the glue reattaching the rhomb – and is still considered a masterpiece.

The Alma Queen enticed others to want to return to the Sweet Home Mine and search for more rhodochrosite. In 1991 Bryan Lees and partners began a professional and systematic exploration for mineral specimens.  In 1992 Lees’ operation discovered a 1.5 meter long pocket that yielded incredible — larger than even the Alma Queen — specimens.  Most of the crystals were detached from matrix, jarred from their natural perches by the mining activity.  The largest of the crystals was more than 15 cm across, and was dubbed the Alma King.


Bryan Lees holding the Alma King, just outside the Rainbow Pocket.  The crystal was some 15 cm across!

The Alma King was eventually reattached to matrix, and was brought to the Tucson Gem and Mineral Show in 1993.  I remember seeing the specimen, and was stunned.  I also recall standing next to a old time collector who remarked “too bad it is repaired”.  Wow – my thoughts were not conflicted at all – the repair was sincere and returned a natural masterpiece to it’s rightful magnificence.  It was exactly like the restoration of the Pieta!


The Alma King – repaired. The specimen now sits in the Denver Museum of Natural History.

There is little argument that the repair of the Sweet Home rhodochrosites was the right course of action, and certainly did not diminish the value of the specimens.  However, it also coincided with the crest of a darker tsunami in the collecting hobby that demanded specimen perfection, and art aesthetics overtaking  all other metrics of mineral specimen evaluation.  A significant percentage of the Sweet Home specimens required repair, although the evolving euphemism was “specimen preparation”; a dialog developed around the theme of “returning the specimen to the condition it was in nature”.  This catch phrase has become the a divide between collectors;  those that prize the art of mineral specimens are willing to see flaws removed by polish and resins, while other collectors recoil at any man-induced enhancements and celebrate only that which can be documented “as found”.  This gulf is wide, and brings cries of “fake and fraud” from collectors in the later group when they view many of the world’s best mineral specimens. However, this group of collectors – the old school – is dying away.  Not yet irrelevant, but mostly marginalized.  I am old school.


The cover of the Mineralogical Record, January 2015. On the cover is one of the most amazing tourmaline specimens in existence, and the volume is full of information on the Pederneira mine. What is missing is the painstaking history of specimen repair and restoration – much work is done with added materials.

When a grey line becomes red — and crossed

In the last 50 years the mineral collecting hobby has seen dramatic changes – or perhaps evolution.  What was once the realm of rockhounds is now a glided age of art.  One of the most obvious symptoms of this change is what collectors accept and expect in a mineral specimen.  Repair and restoration have always been important for mineral specimens; however, the definition of repair and restore has changed as prices have escalated.  There has always been a desire to make specimens attractive, but today it is expected that many  specimens are oiled, waxed or sprayed with silicon to enhance their luster and hide their imperfections.  Use of these cosmetic trappings was once a “red line” for collectors – absolutely rejected.  But just like US foreign policy on the use of chemical weapons, that red line was faded to grey.  A tour through the many hotel rooms of the “high end” mineral dealers participating in the 2015 Westward Look Fine Mineral Show in Tucson (February 6-8) reinforces this dramatic shift;  it is fair to say that most expensive fluorite specimens for sale have been treated with oil, every recent amazonite dug from the pegmatites in the high peaks of Colorado has been “juiced” to enhance the luster, and most gem-quality garnets are getting at least a spray of enhancement.  And, further, casual conversation with collectors seems to reinforce that this is what they want.  Perfection is essential for a work of art.


A comparison of “before and after” for a cut emerald. The cut stone on the left is natural, and on the right has been treated with cedar oil (from

The desire to “improve” minerals is a couple of thousand years old.  There is written accounts of Greeks using cedar oil on emeralds to enhance the color.  The purpose of the oil was to fill the flaws and cracks with a material (the oil) such that when light is shined on the crystal there would not be reflections from the imperfections.  The cedar oil had approximately the right index of refraction (about the same as the emerald itself), and low enough viscosity (when heated) to flow into the tiny cracks, but high enough such that it would remain (at least for a while) after treatment.  Today the oil is mixed with a polymer which “fixes” the oil.  There are about a half dozen “restoration” labs in the US that work on minerals, and most have proprietary processes to do essentially the same thing as the cedar oil treatment except for fluorite, sphalerite, garnet, etc.  The science behind these processes is fairly sophisticated — but the treatment is rarely disclosed.


Classic Gary Larson cartoon – Rowing in Circles. This reminds me of specimen restoration – dealers on one side, collectors on the other. Dealers provide what collectors want, and collectors hear from dealers what specimen perfection should be. It is just rowing in circles.

Today it is hard to “lay blame” for the practice of mineral restoration that relies on removing perceived imperfections at the doorstep of dealers.  The nature of the “trophy collector” is to find perfection – and that sense of perfection does not have to be the hand that nature dealt.  Further, it is clear that repair and restoration no longer decrease specimen value, but actually increase value.  As Sir Walter Scott opined: Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive.

Old School with a New World Order

I love collecting minerals – it is something that I have done with passion for more than 50 years.  I have changed along the way, and the hobby has changed even more than I.  I am deeply disturbed by many of the changes, but that does not make them “wrong”. Just as I am aghast at at what I perceive as the personal values of generations other than mine, my sense of why I collect, and what a mineral specimen means to me, does not have to be shared with others.  The Dalai Lama says: “Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.”  I don’t need to change what and how I collect.  It is the science and human story that are codified and crystallized in my minerals. That is why I happily collect that which is repaired and total reject oils and waxes.  A red line.


Stories in Stone: Mineral Collecting and the Tucson Gem and Mineral Show

A rock or stone is not a subject that, of itself, may interest a philosopher to study; but, when he comes to see the necessity of those hard bodies, in the constitution of this earth, or for the permanency of the land on which we dwell, and when he finds that there are means wisely provided for the renovation of this necessary decaying part, as well as that of every other, he then, with pleasure, contemplates this manifestation of design, and thus connects the mineral system of this earth with that by which the heavenly bodies are made to move perpetually in their orbits. James Hutton, the Father of Geology, 1795


Moon Rise over the Catalina Mountains — Start of the Tucson Show, 2014 (photo, Michelle Hall)

One of my very first memories — vivid in my mind but probably a mixture of early experiences – is collecting topaz crystals with my father in west-central Utah.  Today, I know we were at Topaz Mountain, but my childhood memory is an image of a sandy wash on a cold winter day.  I was probably 4 years old given that my father was on temporary duty away from Los Alamos and working at the Dugway Proving Grounds.  My father had made a couple of screens, and we were shoveling the sands of the wash on to the screens and sorting through the leavings for nearly colorless topaz crystals.  We found then by the bucket load, and I remember holding in my hand dozens of crystals that sparkled brightly in the sunlight.  I don’t really remember what I was thinking when I held those crystals, but I have been collecting minerals ever since that trip.  In the 54 years or so since that memory I have searched through a thousand mines in the western US for minerals, built a dozen collections, made large rock gardens, sold thousands of minerals to buy a few hundred, and visited every mineral museum I could find in the world.  I discovered mineral shows in the 1960s, and in 1973 my father and I went to our first Tucson Gem and Mineral Show.  It was an amazing experience for me – we first went to the Desert Inn, and I could not believe the array of minerals for sale on the top of beds in a hotel!  However, it was the main show that hooked me forever.  On the show floor were special exhibit cases, and one of the very first we visited was Harvard case, which contained what I think, is the world’s most famous mineral:  a 5-inch tall “ram’s horn” of gold from Colorado.  I was spell bound!  And right next to the gold was cerussite from New Mexico that was so much better than anything I had ever seen from my home state that I was in disbelief.  I have not missed a Tucson show since that time!

The experience of that first Tucson Show had a profound effect on me, and it is fair to say it shaped my life.  I went to New Mexico Tech for my undergraduate degrees, and many weekends were spent collecting minerals from all over New Mexico – these were the seed corn to my personal collection.  Every February I would load up my pickup with the spoils of my efforts and head for Tucson. I would sell everything (for a lot less than I hoped) to a couple of dealers in motel rooms, and then use the money to buy 5 to 10 minerals for my collection.  Nothing was easy, but 1970s were a far different time, and there were many mineral dealers interested in good, colorful low-end specimens in bulk.  I still have 3 specimens that I purchased in those heady days.  When I graduated from Caltech in 1983 with a degree in seismology I had 4 different job offers, but there was only one that I wanted – a professorship at the University of Arizona.  I am a bit embarrassed to say that I based my career choice not on scholarly reputation, but rather on the opportunity to live at the center of the mineral collecting universe!


Catalogue number 1 in my present collection – a wire of silver from Kongsberg purchased at the Tucson show in 1978

The 2014 Show

 2014 is the 60th Anniversary of the Tucson Gem and Mineral Show.  Every year they have a theme, and this year in honor of the 60years of bringing thousands of collectors from around the world to southern Arizona, the theme is “Diamonds, Gold and Silver”.   The theme serves as a focus for special exhibits on the show floor, and I committed to put in several cases of my minerals and help organize a community display (in general, I do not like to display my collection – in fact, I don’t particularly like to show my minerals even in my own home).

Since the mid-1980s I have exclusively collected silver and silver minerals.  Although I enjoy mineralogy and mining in general, silver is my passion.  Else where I have written about silver: “For many collectors, the word conjures up images of baroque ropes of white, lustrous metal from Kongsberg or beautiful herringbone plates from Batopilas.  For other collectors, the vermillion red of a Chanarcillo proustite is  the most alluring color of all specimens.  Silver and silver-bearing minerals are part of the nobility of the mineral kingdom; no other group of minerals has more associated mining lore or history.  Silver financed empires and great wars. Silver is said to have magical purifying properties, and alchemists promised secret processes to turn lead into silver (both of these myths are partially true!).  To the mineral collector, silver minerals hold a particular fascination.  Superb specimens are known from hundreds of localities worldwide, and unlike gold, silver is quite a reactive element, forming more 160 different silver-bearing elements”.

I brought minerals for two cases:  one focused on native silver and acanthit group minerals (acanthite has the formula of Ag2S, and the acanthite group minerals include some substitution for silver like Japlaite and Sylvanite, and there are also substitutions for sulfur including tellurium and selenium for Hessite and Naumannite ), and the other focused on pyrargyrite, proustite, stephanite, polybasite, and handful of other silver minerals that were some of the best of their kind.


In front of my two cases – (1) silver and acanthite minerals, and (2) common silver sulfosalts

The Silver and Acanthite Case

Silver owes is wonderful qualities to its placement on the periodic table. Silver has an atomic number of 47, and sits below copper and above gold.  These two metals are in many ways similar to silver, but they show relatively more and less mineralogical diversity. Gold is heavier and a larger atom, from which it is more difficult to remove electrons.  Thus, gold tends to stay mainly in the native state or form semimetallic compounds with tellurium and silver.  A copper atom, on the other hand, is smaller than an atom of silver and can readily give up either one or two electrons in the process of forming compounds. This allows for the formation of many more copper minerals than silver minerals including copper silicates and carbonates. All three metals have similar atomic structures, which is a face-centered cube held together by metallic bonds.  A characteristic of a face-centered cubic lattice is that the metals are extremely malleable and ductile as well has good conductors of heat and electricity. Silver has the highest conductivity of the metals. Native silver has a bright white color; it has the highest reflectivity of any metal in the visible spectrum, and thus appears to “shine”.


Silver is relatively abundant but dispersed in the Earth’s curst.  Magmatic activity concentrates silver, and the vast majority of silver deposits are related to volcanic activity

When not in its native form, silver is generally monovalent (Ag+1).  The silver atom has an affinity for anions of sulfur, selenium and tellurium, all of which have similar anionic radii.  These silver minerals are known are silver sulfides (in the nomenclature of Dana, these include the tellurides and selenides), and are the most important ore minerals for silver.  The acanthite group is the most common and simplest of the sulfides.  This group includes acanthite, argentite, aguilarite, naumannite, hessite, petzite, empressite, jalpaite, stromeyerite and eucairite. This group of minerals displays a remarkable structural phenomena called temperature-dependent dimorphism.  At high temperatures these minerals are usually cubic or hexagonal, but at lower temperatures these minerals exhibit orthorhomibic or monoclinic structure.  The transition temperature is usually between 130o and 180o C.  Acanthite and argentite are the most common dimorphic pair, and most specimens of acanthite seen in mineral collections show a cubic or octahedral habit “frozen” in at the higher temperature of formation.


Silver Sulfosalt case

The “common” silver sulfosalts Case– proustite, pyrargyrite, stephanite and polybasite 

Silver sulfosalts are the most beautiful group of silver minerals.  The sulfosalts are composed of silver, lead, and copper as cations and at least one semimetals (arsenic, antimony, or bismuth) linked with sulfur in anionic groups.  Two of these sulfosalts are proustite and pyrargyrite are known as the “ruby silvers” because of their translucent red color.  In the ruby silvers the anionic group is either AsS3 (proustite) or SbS3 (pyrargyrite), arranged in a trigonal pyramid.  The semimetal is at the apices of the pyramid, with the sulfur atoms at the base.  Silver atoms connect the group in such a way that each sulfur atom has two nearest silver atoms.  Both proustite and pyragyrite are light sensitive; exposure to certain wavelengths of light break one of the sulfur bonds and liberate a silver atom that migrates to the surface of the crystal face.  Over time ruby silvers become black, which is the result of a thin silver coating on the crystals that quickly reduces to acanthite.

Although there are more than 160 silver bearing minerals, only about a half dozen are relatively common in macroscopic crystals.  The simplest of the silver minerals belong to a group called the silver halides, which are ionic bonds between silver and C, Br, or I. The largest number of silver minerals are sulfosalts (including proustite and pyrargyrite) with more than thirty distinct species.  The two most common in crystallized specimens are stephanite (Ag5SbS4) and polybasite (Ag16Sb2S11).


A family of prostate crystals from the sulfosalt case — very hard to get the red right, but great crystals one and all.

The Kongsberg Case

I also organized a community case on Kongsberg, which is the most famous locality for native silver in history.  When silver was chosen as a theme for the show I knew we had to put together a case on Kongsberg.  I volunteered to get a couple of the famous collectors to commit to bringing a few specimens to be put in an exhibit.  The fraternity of silver collectors is relatively small, and we all know each other.  It was easy to get people to commit — but it was harder to get the contributors to limit the number of specimens that they brought!

Highlights of the Show

The MAIN Tucson Gem and Mineral Show is always an event.  The show lasts 4 days, and the Tucson Convention Center and Arena is filled with mineral, gem, fossil and jewelry dealers along with spectacular special exhibits and seminars and talks.  The public paid attendance is about 35,000, but the actual attendance with dealers, exhibiters, students and guests is probably about 50-55,000 people.  Anyone that is a serious mineral collector comes to this show, and it is very international. It is fair to say that most of my closest friends are in this community, and the common interest of things “mineral” creates a strong social fabric.

The opening of the show on Thursday is a mad rush – and mostly serious mineral people.  Within an hour the floor is swarming with people looking through dealers stock, and after that, cruising the special exhibits looking at the treasures that come from around the world. My experience is that not too many minerals are sold on Thursday, but lots of decisions are made.  Those decisions are consummated on Friday and Saturday (and for the most part, the mineral community believes that all sales are negotiations, so serious work is needed before minerals exchange hands).


11 am opening day at the Tucson Show, one hour after the doors opened.  This is the booth of my friends Dave Bunk (Dave Bunk Minerals) and Gloria Staebler (Lithographie).

Every year the most asked question is “what’s new for this year”, meaning what new mineral discovery has happened in the last year and is marketed in Tucson.  This year the biggest news are some extraordinary azurite crystals from Milpillas.  Milpillas is a  copper mine in Sonora, Mexico, across the border from Bisbee, Arizona.  Milpillas mining operations entered a zone of carbonate rocks in 2006, and wonderful copper carbonates flooded the market. The quality was on par with the best ever – similar to Bisshee from the turn of the 19th/20th century and Tsumeb in the mid-20th century. About 2 years ago the oxide zone was exhausted, and it seemed that the Milpillas era had come to an end.  The mining begin in the sulfide zone and the milling operations were altered to reflect the sulfide feed stock.  However, six months ago the mining encountered a fault zone that had allowed the carbonate mineralization to occupy a sliver within the sulfide zone.  It seems that mining management turned a temporary blind eye to the miners collecting the fault zone since the milling process was already adjusted to a different chemistry, and some truly extraordinary azurites have come to light.  In my opinion these may be the finest azurites in history;  however, thee are thousands of pieces for sell, so there is a psychological numbness to importance of this mineral find.  Ten years from now the entire mineral community will talk about the “great old days” for azurite crystals.


 Milpillas azurite in Evan Jones’ booth at the Tucson Gem and Mineral Show.

My favorite part of the show is the special exhibits.  It is like visiting museums and great private collections from across the world.  There were great displays on the theme – diamonds, gold and silver.  One of the many surprises was the Smithsonian display on diamonds.  They literally had a pile of diamonds that had been confiscated from smugglers that get turned over to the museum.


Pile of diamond — the Smithsonian Institution.

There are more than 130 exhibits, and the vast majority are wonderful.  A couple of the exhibits were very unusual though and caught my eye.  For 4000 years mankind has been carving gemstones and minerals for decorations.  We have a fascination with the natural beauty of stones and the perfection of nature to present color and form.  One of the cases that I really liked this year had polished slabs of rhodochrosite and malachite  – pink and green.  These slices were cut from stalagmites, and the concentric rings are not unlike the growth rings in a tree.  The display matched the size for these stalagmites to make for a stunning display.


Slices of rhodochrosite and malachite.

The University of Arizona Mineral Museum had several displays, all very good.  However, one had special meaning to me — gold, silver and platinum from the Hubert C. de Monmonier collection.  This was the last major donation I worked on as curator of the Museum, and is a fabulous, eclectic collection built over a life time.  Hubert was a man of modest means but he built a world case collection;  871 mineral specimens  including 350 quartz specimens, 146 tourmaline, 44 silver, 38 beryl and more than 70 gold specimens.


Gold and platinum from the University of Arizona Mineral Museum.

Another favorite case for me was assembled by Dave Bunk to show the best of Colorado silver.  There are three mining districts in the state that stand out:  Aspen, Creede and Leadville.  The two former districts have produced the bulk of notable specimens.  Dave collected specimens from private collections (his own, Bryan Lees and Ed Raines in particular) as well as the museums at the Colorado School of Mines and the Denver Museum of Natural History.


Included in the case were some historic artifacts — a vase made from Aspen silver, and a chunk of the largest silver “nugget” found at Aspen (it is the block in the upper right hand corner of the picture of the case).


Smuggler Mine silver “nugget” found in 1894 weighing 1840 lbs. The Dave Bunk display contained a piece that weighed about 5 pounds!

Finally, a case that I really enjoyed celebrated birth of modern crystallography under one of the founders of mineralogy, Abraham Gottlob Werner. Werner was born into a mining family, and he studied mining (and law) at Freiberg, which is an grand locality for silver and silver minerals.  In 1775 he was appointed an instructor at the Freiberg Mining Academy, and he published the first modern textbook on descriptive mineralogy, Von den äusserlichen Kennzeichen der Fossilien. The case displayed a collection of wood crystal models that were hand made to illustrate the various classes and forms.


The wood crystal models created at the direction of the father of modern mineralogy.

The Tucson Show is always an experience – educational, social, and even spiritual.  This year’s show is special for its exhibits.  Although the sense of wonder that I had when I first went to the show in 1973 can’t be duplicated, the show still is grand on an international scale.  Tucson itself is fabulous in its own way with a unique flora and fauna, and skies that are magic in the winter.  Still much show to go in 2014, but it has already been a great event.


Close of the 2014 Tucson Gem and Mineral Show.  Sunset behind Wasson Peak